Urban Elephants
drawingmethod excel2003 hackerabc


Home The Herd: Have Your Say
Why is Mayor Bloomberg so wrong about building a mosque in the shadow of the WTC?  I'm convinced it is because at the top echelons of the Manhattan elite, conformity to certain opinions shackles the mind every bit as much as rank ignorance does.

As a consequence of his immense wealth he is sometimes independent and can surprise you, but not as often as one would wish and this is a perfect example of where he is a rank disappointment.  In this case, Bloomberg's acting every bit the part of the limousine-Liberal and his independence has left him far from the views of the right-thinking majority of the people of NY and the nation.  

In one sense, you have to be impressed with the critics of the mosque for their composure during this episode.  Even they have been scrupulous about their rhetoric concerning the matter, which is probably to the good in this case, it being Manhattan (where everyone learns what to think from the New York Times).  

I only wish that they'd been able to meet with the Mayor to open his eyes to the subtler aspect of this mosque, which is its symbolic power to stir masses of muslims against us.  These people think and act Biblically and see every small victory in terms of the eschaton, which they firmly (if idiotically) believe is immanent and can even be accelerated by their acts of terror.  

Bloomberg might have been impressed by such an argument, had he been presented it, instead he sees all opposition as a simple matter of bigotry (in part because he is an elitist, and also because in all probability he is not much acquainted with religious history).  He should, by all rights, be sufficiently well-read to understand these things, but even our best politicians are intellectually pretty pedestrian, and when you get down to it he's just a businessman-billionaire, -- and not a thinker.  

I know that this mosque will attract many of the worst elements in the Islamic community who will revel in being in the shadow of the towers they took down. It will be a thrill for them to be at the heart of ground zero as they preach hate and in all probability, plot more terror.  It is this that Bloomberg should consider when he speaks out in favor of a mosque. 

However, there is at least one group that could put a halt to this ill-conceived idea, and that is the construction unions.  The laborers, iron workers, and building trade unions are no friends of the mosque, you can be sure, and they are fully capable of slowing progress on the building to a standstill, and there isn't a damn thing anyone could do about it.  

They can't be "ordered" to work faster, or to deliver better concrete, or to stop the "mishaps" from happening  on the job.  If they get it in their minds that this Mosque isn't going up in the shadow of the WTC, I guarantee you that it won't go up.  I'm one who thinks  they would be doing the City and the nation a great service if they made stopping this project a priority. 

Albany dysfunction is the Welfare-state gone feral

Posted by: Mark Alesse in Untagged  on

Mark Alesse
A short while back the Times Union published a letter of mine in support of Governor Paterson's plan for a one-day per week furloughs for state jobs. I sent that same letter to my friend and Senator, Neil Breslin. He responded many days later, assuring me that he would oppose furloughs or any such similar attempts to close the budget gap. He has always viewed the world thus.
 
Below is my response to Neil, who is a friend.
 
It explains the real reason for dysfunction and outright failure in the state's most important institution, its government, is in reality the predictable outcome of the successful coming to fruition of the welfare state. The victory of the welfare state has left us bereft of all the personal characteristics that had sustained us as a state and a nation, and made of us a debtor and a thief. We are stealing from future generations the possibility of enjoying freedoms and privileges that we had but squandered. In our glib use of government power, we used it badly and in the process left ourselves and our children much poorer.  Generations going forward will be paying our debt for things that the likes of Senator Pedro Espada wanted for himself and his family. He used state money (our money) to get them and bragged about it on television. This is our government. This is the welfare state gone feral. 


Dear Neil,

You should know better than most that the state cannot afford it's obligations because it has a weakening economy, an aging population, and has promised too many free services to people who would rather not pay for them. So we made other people pay for them (through higher taxes) until there weren't enough other people. They accomplished this political legerdemain democratically, by electing legislators who don't know how to say NO and who have little or no experience with the hard realities of meeting a payroll for a business that has to compete for its survival, while paying (ungodly) unaffordable taxes and complying with impossible regulations mandated by governments. That particular combination of spinelessness and naiveté is deadly when a government majority is comprised of such men and women. It results in government bankruptcy. A bad business climate. A shrinking population. No way out. That's right. No way out is a possible finale. It may become ours. It may be too late now to avoid a generalized collapse, as you look at a world where sovereign debt in Greece can bring Europe to its knees and many dozens of wars threaten to escalate in unpredictable ways all the time (Israel's defense of itself is but one of many flash points in the world).  We may suffer a slo-motion collective, cultural and economic slump due to the failures of governments all around the world to control their debt and manage their taxes responsibly and control terrorism. 

Instead, we have created largely inept, bankrupt governments for as far as the eye can see. States, localities, the US Federal government, member states of the Euro zone, and governments in the developing world are comprised of over-sized, ineffective bureaucracies. Success is not a word in their vocabulary. Government doesn't solve any problems, and doesn't do much of anything that you could say was the pride of the people involved. New York has gone from hero to zero in less than one generation.  And just in case it hasn't occurred to you, the dominant political philosophy the entire time that this was happening, here and abroad, was the liberal welfare state, an amalgam of pro unionist, leftist, statist - and deeply suspicious (if envious) of private wealth and the enterprises that create it. 

The modern western economies grew to be able to have created the ideal welfare state and then found out that the people and businesses needed to pay for it couldn't keep up. The expectations were too grandiose. And the ignorance of how economies functioned led to regulatory and tax overkill by governments. We have become victims of our own success. And the only way back, if it isn't too late, is to stop the government's growth, then shrink the government, then audit its programs and make them successful or cut them, and, finally, reduce marginal tax rates for everyone. More money in my hands is far more powerful than taxing me to create countless numbers of do-nothing government jobs. With our own money at our command, invest in the economy so we can get richer, we will pay for the services we truly want, and anyone who wants more will be encouraged to do the same. We won't be a welfare state any longer, and the dreams of our lower classes won't include a lottery ticket, a racing stub, or a state job; it will be the "American dream" of owning a business, buying a house you can pay for, and protecting what's yours and your family's. 

That's the sort of reform Albany needs. A cultural shift from the welfare state utopian dreamscape of the naive and inexperienced, to the American dream of self-sufficiency and individual responsibility.

Regards,
Mark


PATERSON NOT BACKING OFF FURLOUGH PLAN…

This item may be the biggest news of the week. If Paterson uses his Ace-in-the-hole to trump the Legislature and the State labor unions, he will be doing MORE than Cuomo, Pataki, or Spitzer had ever dared. Perhaps having nothing to lose politically is an empowering thing, after all.


If the Republicans and Conservatives want to field candidates who win and thus begin to influence policy in New York again, they will have to cross-endorse Democrats who are conservative. Republicans and Conservatives might not like it, but these are the facts of life in Blue-state New York politics.

This means that Levy must resist being "re-branded" as a Republican if he hopes to win. If he becomes identified as the Republican in the race for Governor, the vast majority of voters (people who are Democrats, after all) won't give him the time of day, much less their votes. They just won't listen to him, and if they do, it will be filtered by the fact that he is in the wrong party and can't be trusted. That's how the partisan psychology of voters generally operates and their is no reason to think it won't in this case, unless Levy leverages his Democratic roots.

If Levy is smart, he'll use his personal history with the Democratic Party to his advantage. Having been a lifelong Democrat, he's uniquely situated to get Democrats to listen to his messages, and if they happen to be middle-class Democrats, what he says about the need for "fiscal responsibility" in government may make sense to them. Couple that with his willingness to take on the powerful (and greedy) public employee unions, and he may have a chance to win a great many Democratic votes...


Vote every incumbent out of office

Posted by: Mark Alesse in Untagged  on

Mark Alesse
This very sage and simple message is being circulated on the Internet and  I thought it should be repeated.  
 
Vote every incumbent out of office in the next elections.
 
If you're Democrat, vote Democrat if you wish.
Just don't vote for the incumbent.
If you're Republican, ditto, vote Republican.
Just don't vote for the incumbent.
 
The message to all politicians: we're tired of their incompetence, corruption, careerism, and indifference to best interests of the citizenry.  If the country votes out all the incumbents, the incoming politicians will get the message.
 
It's pretty simple.  Nobody needs to change parties, because, lets face it, there's plenty of blame to spread around.  Call them Republicrats, or Dempublicans, the incumbents in office have failed to solve one single problem. 
 
A few good politicians may lose their jobs, but they have better retirement benefits than 99% of the American public.
 
You've had to struggle for the last 5 years. Some of you have lost your job and may be working in some other sector just to feed your family.  I guarantee you, none of them will suffer like this country has.
  
To All 535 voting members of the Legislature; it is now official, you have all failed the country. Below is an abbreviated list of your shortcomings:
 
a.. The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. 
You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.
b.. Social Security was established in 1935.
You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.
c.. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. 
You have had 71 years to get it right and it is broke.
d.. War on Poverty started in 1964. 
You have had 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor" and  they only want more.
e.. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. 
You have had 44 years to get it right and they are broke.
f.. Freddie Mac was established in 1970.
You have had 39 years to get it right and it is broke.
g.. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil.  It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a  year and we import more oil than ever before. 
You had 32 years to get it right and it is an abysmal failure.
 
You have FAILED in every "government service" you have shoved down our throats, while overtaxing us, overspending our tax dollars, and incurring more debt every year.
 
AND NOW YOU WANT US TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?
 
IT'S NOT ABOUT THE NEED FOR GOOD HEALTH CARE, IT'S ABOUT TRUSTING THE GOVERNMENT TO RUN IT! 
 
So, say goodbye to the good life, Congress.  Americans are fed up with you.   
 

This from The Gothamist website:

With Albany crippled by ethics scandals and general political inaction, former Mayor Ed Koch told the Times it's his duty to shake things up.


T'was Albany killed the King (revised)

Posted by: Mark Alesse in Untagged  on

Mark Alesse

Few people really understand the magnitude of what's happened to New York’s government, and fewer still see how it's related to and a part of the fracturing of the foundations revealed nationally and globally on a daily basis. It is valuable to focus on New York because what happens in New York is always instructive in understanding the larger stage. New York and the influences of New York City are, and always will be worth dissecting. 

I've been thinking of how our Governor, David Paterson, came to his sad pass and what a surprise his situation now would have seemed to us back when he first rose to the highest office in the state. Nobody had extraordinarily high hopes when he took over, but nobody thought he would have sunk so low, because we knew him and liked his whole schtick. I met him when he was Senate Minority Leader, and thought I knew him even better because of his frequent appearances on Fred Dicker's daily radio show. Dicker, the NY Post’s perpetually dyspeptic, sharp-eyed Albany bureau chief even liked him, I think. David was universally well received. He was enjoyable. He was quick with a quip and sharp on the uptake, self-deprecating and unassuming, and he knew what the deal was with Albany's three-men-in-a-room Budgeting syndrome, and how it led to over-spending which tipped all the remaining dominoes resulting in chronic deficits. Surely, someone like this could to no worse than inch the state in a positive direction, or so we all hoped. 

But, without doubt, David Paterson proved us completely wrong and now he must go, just as Eliot Spitzer had to go. The tabloids are spot-on about this, and I doubt he’ll be around beyond April.  

However, as bad as his behavior became (and good people can do bad things) and as ineffective an administrator as David proved, he just as surely was victimized by his circumstances, including and especially his blindness.  This should have been obvious from the start, since his inability to read would narrowly limit his sources of information and leave him dependent on whoever had personal access to him.  That turned out to be his chauffeur, of all people, who unfortunately is an unreconstructed thug with a smooth tongue. David was also victimized by his cosseted upbringing among the Harlem elite, a notoriously lax work ethic, intellectual limits borne of his inability to read, and his very poor choices of friends and confidants...


Dysfunction; the crux of the matter.

Posted by: Mark Alesse in Untagged  on

Mark Alesse
When the Brennan Center first tagged New York as home to "the most dysfunctional legislature in the nation" back in 1994 and others, including many Urban Elephants, the NY Post, and the Empire Center have dissected in various ways since then, is the culture of State politics. But the same dynamics that make Albany a mess are at work in Washington, Wall Street and in every institution, corporation, or enterprise.
 
With government, outsiders get elected to office and come to the Capitol often with good intentions and some idea of what goes on, but invariably become acculturated to the folk-ways and values of the place and either assimilate and begin to do the same bad things the place is renowned for, or they become outcastes and pariahs. 
 
The sub culture is invisible and often informal, but ubiquitous and all but irresistible.  It insinuates its way into hearts and minds like a virus infects the body, and like a virus, it doesn't go away. There are some flashes of insight that occur from time to time among legislators, but that's about all it amounts to, a flash in the pan.  I remember Bill Parment, a Democratic Assemblyman from Chautauqua County once said that what went on in the Capitol, to him, often resembled a "criminal enterprise."  He didn't resign though. 

His comments were not warmly received by Speaker Shelly, largely because he was right.  But then, what institutions aren't run that way?  
 
I suspect that Wall Street has more people who admired what Bernie Madoff pulled off than were offended by it. Union leaders everywhere and almost all throughout history have been and are notoriously indifferent to their members real best interests, and would always trade lay-offs for a giant pay hike. Polls show that almost everyone thinks they are corrupt and willing to be criminally corrupt and violent, too.  
 
Religions aren't exempt. The priesthood at some point in time in history became the vocation of choice for pedophiles; and can you name me any other religious "guides," Imams, Rabbis, Reverends or Life-Coaches who aren't more interested in money than miracles?  To be sure, they'll always feign interest in the latter, but only to get at the former.  

Every organization or business that I ever worked for seemed dysfunctional to me in exactly the same ways that the human mind is dysfunctional. Our psychology is hard wired for greed and self-aggrandizement.  We simply hide it from ourselves by calling it ambition.  
 
We even teach our children to think that their lives will never amount to much if they don't become ambitious enough to get into a "good" college, even if the costs are so far beyond their family's means that they have to borrow everything to attend. Whereupon they enter into a small, toxically too-liberal society where cheating is fully acceptable among their peers, and learning is secondary to "finding yourself," expressing your (largely ignorant) self, and consuming as much booze and sex as you possibly can.  Our young graduate into the larger society barely as literate as any ordinary high school grad from the 1940s and 50s was, with a burden of debt to carry for years, and little to offer in the way of marketable skills in an economy that no one has any confidence in anymore.  Is it any wonder that things are coming a cropper?
 
Thanks to what passes for values today, we have unimaginably large governments committed to doing everything for everyone and growing larger at all costs, even if they tax to extinction all the sources of prosperity.  
 
Backed by Constitutionally appointed powers, the half-educated half-men who control Leviathan are just smart enough to have devised the means to assure their hold on power in virtual perpetuity. They fixed it so they aren't accountable for their mistakes or the unmistakable failures of their programs. They don't try to measure progress, much less resolve problems.  And in the face of what is surely a systemic social failure on all levels and among virtually all institutions, we are faced with serial crises and a widespread loss of confidence. (To think that Jimmy Carter thought it was bad on his watch.) 

In fact, it's so bad that putting the bell on the cat's collar can get you hurt, both figuratively and literally. Whistle-blowers are few and far between.  But what the hell; let the ugly truth be told again... We have seen the enemy and he is us.  
 
One can only pray that the common sense of the common man is brought to bear soon and we find a way to restructure all the feral institutions, here and abroad, that have already started to eat their young. 


Obama speech won't change a thing

Posted by: Mark Alesse in Untagged  on

Mark Alesse

So, Obama's going to show us what he learned form the Scott Brown victory and hit the reset button. The question is, will it matter?  The answer is no.

He will never freeze spending, no matter what he promises. Congress or the WH will finagle growth by off budget gimmicks, you can be certain.


The lessons of the Brown victory in Massachusetts

Posted by: Mark Alesse in Untagged  on

Mark Alesse
Editor,

While liberal Democrats and media pundits try to spin the Scott Brown Senate victory into insignificance, it should be noted that moderate Democrats everywhere are breathing a sign of relief. 
 
The election of a conservative to the US Senate in left-leaning Massachusetts will almost certainly subdue the Democratic Congress, and slow its Left-wing policy assault on free-market capitalism. That, ironically, may save the careers of more than a few Blue-dog Democrats who have had to hold their noses while voting for the Obama, Reid, Pelosi agenda. 

It was the overreaching of the Leftist agenda of the Obama administration and Congress that gave Brown the victory. That agenda is simply out of favor with the American public and is now finished.  So, too, is the masquerade that President Obama would bring a new kind of "bipartisan politics" to Washington. Only an honest politics of interests and values vying for power remains, which is not more to be despised for being so, as it substitutes for guns in settling differences, just as the Founders designed.  

The Brown victory also puts the lie to the notion that the Tea Party phenomenon is anything but a grassroots uprising of patriot citizens who became fed up with a government that underperforms and over-taxes.
 
Thanks to the blogosphere over the Internet, today's Silent Majority has learned how to organize and fight for the values it holds dear. They believe that individual responsibility, freedom, and free-market capitalism are what create jobs and wealth, -- not government programs.
 
It is of more than passing interest that you can identify the leader of every special interest in Washington (and Albany) but you can't name the leader of the Tea Party movement. That's because there isn't one. This is a peaceful, people's revolution; and grassroots to its core. Having recognized one of their own in Scott Brown, they spread the word via email and blogs to raise money for his run in Massachusetts and won.
 
Brown is the first Tea Party Senator in our nation's history, but he won't be the last. Not as long as Democrats chose to believe the spin and refuse to see the truth behind the Brown victory.   

Mark Alesse ( This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it )
Delmar


  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »

UE Login

We have 737 guests online

UE Online

None

UE Contributors

Alicia Colon

Jay Golub

Robert Hornak

Herb London

Roger Madon

Dick Morris

Deroy Murdock

Star Parker


Paladin

ue
The Editors


Polls

Who do you think would be the stronger candidate for governor to face Andrew Cuomo in November?
 

Latest Comments

Little known Queens ...
http://www.newyorktransportationsurvey.org/candida...
Jonathan Judge Cries...
Does anyone else get motion sickness reading AAA's...
Eric Adams: "Throw t...
Isn't Sen Adam's attack on the black kids who wear...
Malpass Launches Ad ...
Malpass is the smartest of the three GOP primary c...
Eric Adams: "Throw t...
Why is it that anything a conservative says about ...
Malpass Launches Ad ...
Whitney, you clearly are in the tank for DioGuardi...
Court Rejects Berney...
I find it very amusing the desperation of the Bern...
Malpass Launches Ad ...
Did you see Malpass' performance in the debate? It...
Tabone Files Petitio...
Calling Speranza a "9-11 hero" is a bit of a stret...
Tabone Files Petitio...
It was amusing to read the above complaint about t...
Court Rejects Berney...
Robert Hornak obviously knows nothing about law if...
Little known Queens ...
Thanks for the history, Frank. Alex has been stick...
Little known Queens ...
For many years, this was the "Alan Hevesi" seat. ...
Cat and Mouse: Wakin...
More Evidence of Chinese "Push Back" on the High S...
Lucretia Potter In H...
Hey Dagny T's back the original creator of the hat...

For more of our original content, please visit The Trunk for articles from our offical writers or The Herd for posts in our open blogger section.